@Forester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agorollin' coalyiffit.netimagemessage-square150fedilinkarrow-up1583arrow-down144
arrow-up1539arrow-down1imagerollin' coalyiffit.net@Forester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square150fedilink
minus-square@NegativeInf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink11•2 months agoBoth have a storage problem. But coal has a destroys the atmosphere problem. So, yes, trade-offs.
minus-square@deegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilink-7•2 months agoYou’re moving the goalposts after they debunked the first claim.
minus-square@9bananas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink7•2 months ago“debunking” requires a source… otherwise they just put forth a claim
Both have a storage problem. But coal has a destroys the atmosphere problem. So, yes, trade-offs.
You’re moving the goalposts after they debunked the first claim.
“debunking” requires a source… otherwise they just put forth a claim